Isotopic fluorination and applications thereof

ABSTRACT

Methods of C—H bond fluorination using non-heme manganese catalyst are described herein. For example, a method comprises providing a reaction mixture including a non-heme manganese catalyst, a substrate comprising an sp 3  C—H bond and a fluorinating agent and converting the sp 3  C—H bond to a C—F bond in the presence of the non-heme manganese catalyst or a derivative thereof.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

The present application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/267,097 file Dec. 14, 2015 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT RIGHTS

This invention was made with government support under Grant No. CHE-1148597 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD

The present invention relates to C—H bond fluorination and, in particular, to fluorination of aliphatic C—H bonds with fluorine isotope via non-heme manganese catalyst.

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive and highly sensitive imaging technology for quantitative measurement in the picomolar range and visualization of biological interactions in vivo at the molecular level. Several positron-emitting radioisotopes can be incorporated into biomolecules, but the most prominent radionuclide in the clinic is fluorine-18 (¹⁸F). By far [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG), the most successful commercial PET radiopharmaceutical, has prevailed in oncological diagnosis over two decades.

However, this molecular imaging modality is far from fully exploited, mainly because chemical reactions to introduce ¹⁸F atom into radiotracer candidates are limited. In addition to the difficulty in C—F bond formation, short half-life of ¹⁸F (˜110 min), low ¹⁸F concentration as well as solvent compatibility exacerbate the development of ¹⁸F labeling methodology. Typically, most of radiotracers are labeled through nucleophilic ¹⁸F substitution, in which harsh reaction conditions are required and therefore, functional group compatibility is diminished. Recently, a number of novel ¹⁸F labeling strategies have been developed that can incorporate ¹⁸F into molecules of increasing complexity. Some of these methods have been scaled up and demonstrated in image applications with high specify activity.

Nevertheless, most of current ¹⁸F labeling methods follow “preinstallation” strategy, in which a reactive functional group is preinstalled at the proposed labeled site and subsequently substituted by ¹⁸F. Additional synthetic steps to prepared reactive precursors and harsh reaction conditions of ¹⁸F labeling step limit the application into a broad substrate scope.

SUMMARY

In view of these synthetic challenges, methods of C—H bond fluorination are described herein, including C-¹⁸F bond formation using non-heme manganese catalyst. Briefly, a method comprises providing a reaction mixture including a non-heme manganese catalyst, a substrate comprising an sp³ C—H bond and a fluorinating agent and converting the sp³ C—H bond to an sp³ C—F bond in the presence of the non-heme manganese catalyst or derivative thereof. In some embodiments, the fluorinating agent is an ¹⁸F source, wherein the C—H bond is converted to a C-¹⁸F bond. The ¹⁸F source is no carrier added [¹⁸F]F⁻, in some embodiments. As described further herein, fluorine can be transferred to the substrate from an equatorial ligand position on the non-heme manganese catalyst. Moreover, fluorination and isotopic labeling methods described herein are compatible with a number of functionalities. Suitable substrates, for example, can include one or more functionalities selected from the group consisting of ester, ether, ketone, cyanide, imide, aryl halide and alkyl halide. Such compatibility can permit late stage labeling of a number of organic compounds, including various pharmaceutical compounds.

In further embodiments, non-aliphatic C—H bonds, such as benzylic C—H bonds, can also undergo fluorination according to methods described herein.

These and other embodiments are further described in the following detailed description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates C—H [¹⁸F] fluorination according to some embodiments described herein.

FIG. 2 illustrates various ligand options for non-heme manganese catalyst described herein.

FIG. 3(a) illustrates a proposed catalytic cycle for non-heme manganese catalyzed C—H [¹⁸F] fluorination described herein.

FIG. 3(b) illustrates the crystal structure of non-heme cis-difluoroMn^(III) complex [Mn^(III)(mep)F₂](PF₆).

FIG. 3(c) illustrates a reactivity study of [Mn^(III)(mep)F₂](PF₆).

FIG. 4 illustrates DFT calculations of potential energy surface for hydrogen abstraction, fluorine rebound and oxygen rebound steps.

FIG. 5 illustrates C—H [¹⁸F] fluorination according to some embodiments described herein.

FIG. 6 illustrates [¹⁸F] labeled compounds synthesized according to methods described herein.

FIG. 7 illustrates [¹⁸F] labeled bioactive compounds synthesized according to methods described herein.

FIG. 8 are UV-vis spectra confirming formation of [Mn(IV)(O)(mcp)(L)]⁺ complex according to one embodiment.

FIG. 9 are electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra confirming formation of [Mn(IV)(O)(mcp)(L)]⁺ complex according to one embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments described herein can be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description and examples and their previous and following descriptions. Elements, apparatus and methods described herein, however, are not limited to the specific embodiments presented in the detailed description and examples. It should be recognized that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and adaptations will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Definitions

The term “alkyl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to a straight or branched saturated hydrocarbon group. For example, an alkyl can be C₁-C₃₀.

The term “alkenyl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon group having at least one carbon-carbon double bond.

The term “aryl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to an aromatic monocyclic or multicyclic ring system optionally substituted with one or more ring substituents

The term “heteroaryl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to an aromatic monocyclic or multicyclic ring system in which one or more of the ring atoms is an element other than carbon, such as nitrogen, oxygen and/or sulfur.

The term “cycloalkyl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to a non-aromatic, saturated mono- or multicyclic ring system optionally substituted with one or more ring substituents.

The term “cycloalkenyl” as used herein, alone or in combination, refers to a non-aromatic, mono- or multicyclic ring system having at least one carbon-carbon double bond and is optionally substituted with one or more ring substituents.

Methods of C—H bond fluorination comprise providing a reaction mixture including a non-heme manganese catalyst, a substrate comprising an sp³ C—H bond and a fluorinating agent and converting the sp³ C—H bond to an sp³ C—F bond in the presence of the non-heme manganese catalyst or derivative thereof. In some embodiments, the fluorinating agent is an ¹⁸F source, wherein the C—H bond is converted to C-¹⁸F. In some embodiments, fluorine can be transferred to the substrate from an equatorial ligand position on the non-heme manganese catalyst.

Turning now to specific components, the non-heme manganese catalyst can employ a variety of ligands. The non-heme manganese catalyst, in some embodiments, comprises at least one bidentate or polydentate ligand. The non-heme manganese catalyst also comprises one or more equatorial ligands operable to be displaced by fluorine. Displacement by fluorine can occur in the reaction mixture. Equatorial fluorine transfer to the substrate is a fundamentally different approach compared to prior manganese catalyst employing porphyrin or salen (N,N-bis(salicyaldehyde)ethylenediimine) ligand-based architectures. Porphyrin and salen ligands occupy the four equatorial sites of the manganese complex, thereby precluding equatorial fluorine. In such manganese complexes, fluorine ligand resides at one or both axial positions prior to substrate transfer.

Manganese catalyst of methods described herein, in some embodiments, is of formula (I):

wherein L₁ and L₂ form a first bidentate ligand and L₃ and L₄ form a second bidentate ligand optionally bound to the first bidentate ligand. In some embodiments, X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of fluorine, hydroxyl (OH), oxo (O), triflate (OTf), mesylate (OMs) and tosylate (OTs). Table I below provides various manganese catalytic species of formula (I) according to some non-limiting embodiments. As set forth herein, catalytic species listed in Table I can exist at one or more points in the catalytic fluorination cycle. Species of Table I can exist as starting catalytic reagent or catalytic intermediates. Depending on fluorination reaction parameters, X₁ and X₂ can be the same or different. In some embodiments, X₁ and X₂ are both fluorine. In other embodiments, X₁ can be fluorine with X₂ being hydroxyl or oxo ligand. As discussed further herein X₁ and X₂ can initially comprise ligands displaceable by fluorine and/or other species in the reaction mixture. For example, X₁ and X₂ can be independently selected from the group consisting of substituted sulfonate compounds including triflate (OTf), mesylate (OMs) and tosylate (OTs). Fluorinating agent in the reaction mixture can displace X₁ or X₂ during the catalytic cycle as illustrated in FIG. 3(a).

As indicated by the dashed bond in formula (I), L₁-L₄ can combine to form a tetradentate ligand, such as N,N′-dimethyl-N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)cyclohexane-trans-1,2-diamine (mcp), (N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis-(2-pyridyl methyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine) (mep) or 2-((2-[1-(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)pyridine) (pdp) or derivatives thereof. Coordinating atoms of L₁-L₄ can be nitrogen, oxygen, carbon or various combinations thereof. In some embodiments, coordinating atoms of L₁-L₄ are part of aromatic ring moieties. Alternatively, coordinating atoms of L₁-L₄ are part of alkyl, cycloalkyl, alkenyl or cycloalkenyl moieties. FIG. 2 illustrates various non-limiting ligand options for L₁-L₄ of manganese catalyst described herein.

TABLE I Non-Heme Mn Catalytic Species Mn(mep)F₂ Mn(mcp)(OTf)₂ Mn(mcp)(OH)(F) Mn(mcp)(O)(F) Mn(pdp)(OTf)₂ Mn(pdp)(OH)(F) Mn(pdp)(O)(F)

Non-heme manganese catalyst can be added to the reaction mixture in any amount not inconsistent with the objectives of the present invention. In some embodiments, non-heme manganese catalyst is present in the reaction mixture in an amount of 0.5-30 mol %. Non-heme manganese catalyst may also be present in the reaction mixture in amounts selected from Table II.

TABLE II Non-Heme Manganese Catalyst (mol %) 1-25 5-25 10-20  1-15 15-30 

In addition to manganese catalyst, the reaction mixture includes substrate comprising one or more sp³ C—H bonds. Various substrates having sp³ C—H bonds can be directly fluorinated according to methods descried herein. As illustrated in the examples below, the C—H bond participating in fluorination can be part of an acyclic alkyl moiety or cyclic alkyl moiety. Fluorinated acyclic or cyclic alkyl moieties can be coupled to aryl and/or heteroaryl moieties in some embodiments. Fluorination methods described herein are also compatible with a number of functionalities. Suitable substrates, for example, can include one or more functionalities selected from the group consisting of ester, ether, ketone, cyanide, imide, aryl halide and alkyl halide. Such compatibility can permit late stage labeling of a number of organic compounds, including various pharmaceutical compounds and common scaffolds in bioactive molecules including, but not limited to, amino acids, indan, dibenzocycloheptene and tetrahydronaphthalene. Compounds of Table III and FIGS. 6 and 7 herein illustrate the diversity of suitable substrates for fluorination.

TABLE III ¹⁸F Labeled Biocative Compounds ¹⁸F-celestolide ¹⁸F-protected fingolimod ¹⁸F-N-TFA-rasagiline ¹⁸F-ibuprofen ester ¹⁸F-protected dopamine ¹⁸F-N-Phth-amantadine

Any fluorinating agent not inconsistent with the objectives of the present invention can be used in the reaction mixture. In some embodiments, for example, silver fluoride (AgF) or silver fluoride/trimethylamine trihydrofluoride is the fluorinating agent. Fluorinating agent can also provide ¹⁸F for isotopic labeling applications. Any ¹⁸F source compatible with direct C—H fluorination in conjunction with non-heme manganese catalyst described herein can be used. In some embodiments, the source is fluoride ion, [¹⁸F]F⁻. Such fluoride ion sources can be provided as alkali metal compounds including K[¹⁸F]F. Moreover, ¹⁸F sources can be no carrier added.

Additional components of the reaction mixture can include oxidant. Any oxidant compatible with C—H fluorination described herein can be used. In some embodiments, the oxidant is soluble in the reaction mixture. For example, meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) can be used as soluble oxidant in acetone and acetonitrile solvent systems. Oxidant may participate in the catalytic cycle by oxidizing the non-heme manganese catalyst to afford a reactive oxo-Mn(IV) intermediate which subsequently abstract a H atom from the substrate, producing a carbon centered radical and cis-¹⁸F-Mn^(II)—OH rebound species.

As detailed in the examples herein, phase transfer catalyst may be absent in the reaction mixture. Examples of phase transfer catalyst absent from the reaction mixture include but are not limited to tetrabutylammonium chloride, tetraalkyl ammonium, mixed alkyl ammonium, aryl ammonium, benzyl-trimethylammonium chloride, benzalkonium chloride, benzyl tributylammonium chloride, benzyl triethylammonium chloride, tetrabutyl phosphonium chloride, tetramethyl phosphonium chloride, and dimethyldiphenyl phosphonium chloride.

Methods described herein can provide labeled compound in generally good yield. For ¹⁸F labeling, a method can have a radiochemical conversion (RCC) selected from Table IV.

TABLE IV Radiochemical Conversion ≥30 ≥40 ≥50 ≥60 ≥70 30-90

Given the foregoing radiochemical conversions, less substrate loadings are achievable relative to prior ¹⁸F methods. Prior fluorination methods with Mn(salen) complexes, for example, can require substrate loadings at least five times greater than those for non-heme manganese catalytic species described herein. Fluorine transfer to the substrate via equatorial ligand position on the non-heme manganese catalyst may facilitate fluorination efficiencies and marks a fundamental mechanistic departure from prior manganese catalytic species wherein fluorine transfer to the substrate occurs from an axial position on the Mn complex.

While not wishing to be bound by any theory, a proposed catalytic cycle for non-heme manganese catalyzed C—H [¹⁸F] fluorination is illustrated in FIG. 3(a). Due to limiting amount of [¹⁸F]fluoride in this reaction condition, the resting state of the catalyst is likely to be a cis-¹⁸F-Mn^(II)—OH species. m-CPBA oxidizes the resting Mn^(II) catalyst to afford a reactive oxo-Mn(IV) intermediate, which subsequently abstracts a H atom from the substrate, producing a carbon-centered radical and a cis-¹⁸F-Mn^(IV)—OH rebound species. The ¹⁸F-labeled product is formed via the [¹⁸F]fluorine transfer from cis-¹⁸F-Mn^(IV)—OH complex to substrate radical, together with the regeneration of the resting Mn^(II) catalyst.

Several preliminary experiments were conducted to examine this mechanistic hypothesis. 66% of [¹⁸F] Fluoride loaded on an anion exchange cartridge could be released using the catalyst in acetone solution, suggesting a ligand exchange proceeded during the elution. Treating Mn^(II)(mcp)(OTf)₂ with m-CPBA in acetonitrile at −30° C., a high valent oxomanganese species was generated, indicated by the appearance of a broad absorption from 600 nm to 1100 nm at UV-Vis spectra. The EPR spectrum of this manganese complex showed a typical high-valent mononuclear Mn^(IV) species. These results were assigned to the formation of an oxo-Mn^(IV) complex and it is likely that this species mediates the hydrogen abstraction. This postulate was further supported by measurement of the deuterium kinetic isotope effect (KIE). An intermolecular competitive KIE of 2.7 was observed with a 1:1 mixture of cyclooctane and cycloctane-d₁₆, which is similar with the KIE value of hydrogen abstraction by reported non-heme mononuclear oxo-Mn^(IV) species.

The key step in forming a ¹⁸F-labeled product can be the [¹⁸F]fluorine delivery process from cis-¹⁸F-Mn^(IV)—OH species to carbon radical. Even though a trans-difluoroMn^(IV) porphyrin was isolated and proved to have fluorine transfer ability, there is no example for such a F atom transfer from a non-heme species. A non-heme cis-difluoroMn^(III) complex [Mn^(III)(mep)F₂](PF₆) (mep is N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis-(2-pyridyl methyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine) was isolated and characterized. This Mn^(III) complex was obtained by treating mep ligand with MnF₃ and then introducing KPF₆ for precipitation. The crystal structure of this complex (FIG. 3, b) showed the manganese ion is coordinated by two fluorides that are in cis positions one to the other. The Mn^(III)—F bond lengths of 1.8172(7) Å and 1.8214(7) Å are close to other structure characterized non-heme fluoro-Me species. It was found that in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of [Mn^(III)(mep)F₂](PF₆), phenyl ethyl radical generated by the thermal decomposition of tert-butyl 2-phenylpropaneperoxoate, a 40% yield of 1-fluoroethylbenzene was obtained. This result demonstrates that non-theme fluoroMn^(III) species can trap the radical and deliver the fluorine atom.

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were used to explore the potential energy and electronic structure of intermediates and transition states proposed in FIG. 4 in an acetone solvent continuum. The activation energy of H abstraction of the secondary hydrogen in isopropane by [Mn^(IV)(O)(F)(mcp)]⁻ is 26.8 kcal/mol. F atom transfer from [Mn^(III)(OH)(F)(mcp)]⁻ to the isopropyl radical was predicted to occur with a low activation barrier of 3.9 kcal/mol. A higher calculated transition state was landed for the OH rebound, implicating that a faster reaction rate for F rebound. This is consistent with the fact that ¹⁸F labeling was observed even though the concentration of [¹⁸F]fluoride is very low in reaction mixture.

These and other embodiments are further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.

Example 1—Radiosynthesis of ¹⁸F Labeled Molecules

Compounds 2-25 were prepared according to the reaction scheme of FIG. 5 and as follows. Compounds 2-25 are also illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7.

General Information

Substrates of product 3, 12, 14, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25 were purchased from commercial sources and were protected according to literature procedures. Mn(MCP)(OTf)₂, Fe(MCP)(OTf)₂ and Mn(PDP)(OTf)₂ were synthesized as previous described. 3-Chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) was purified using literature protocol. Substrate of product 21 was purchased from Matrix Scientific. Other commercial materials were of the highest purity available from Aldrich and used without further purification. ¹H NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker NB 300 spectrometer or a Bruker Avance-III (500 MHz) spectrometer and are reported in ppm using solvent as an internal standard (CDCl₃ at δ 7.26, acetone-d₆ at 2.04 or methylene chloride-d₂ at 5.32). Data reported as: chemical shift (δ), multiplicity (s=singlet, d=doublet, t=triplet, q=quartet, m=multiplet), coupling constant (Hz); integrated intensity. ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 (125 MHz) spectrometer and are reported in ppm using solvents as an internal standard (CDCl₃ at 77.15 ppm, acetone-d₆ at 29.92 ppm or methylene chloride-d₂ at 54.0). ¹⁹F NMR spectra (282 MHz) were obtained on a Bruker NB 300 spectrometer and were referenced relative to CFCl₃. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained from the Princeton University mass spectrometer facility by electrospray ionization (ESI). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on an Agilent 1100 series instrument with a binary pump and a diode array detector.

Radiochemistry

General Methods

No-carrier-added [¹⁸F]fluoride was produced from water 97% enriched in ¹⁸O (ISOFLEX, USA) by the nuclear reaction ¹⁸O (p,n)¹⁸F using a Siemens Eclipse HP cyclotron and a silver-bodied target at Massachusetts General Hospital Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging. The produced [¹⁸F]fluoride in water was transferred from the cyclotron target by helium push.

Radiosynthesis of ¹⁸F Labeled Molecules

A 1.5 mL vial with a screw cap was charged with Mn(MCP)(OTf)₂ (6 mg, 0.01 mmol, 20 mol %), substrate (0.05 mmol) and a stir bar (2×5 mm). A portion of aqueous [¹⁸F]fluoride solution (40-50 μL, 4-5 mCi) obtained from the cyclotron was loaded on to an Chromafix PS-HCO₃ IEX cartridge, which had been previously washed with 5.0 mg/mL K₂CO₃ in Milli-Q water followed by 5 mL of Milli-Q water. Then, the cartridge loaded with [¹⁸F]fluoride was washed with 2 mL Milli-Q water and [¹⁸F]fluoride was released from the cartridge using 1 mL of (80% acetone and 20% 5.0 mg/mL K₂CO₃ in Milli-Q water) solution. 20 μl, of this [¹⁸F]fluoride acetone solution was added to the vial containing the catalyst and the substrate. The resulting solution was stirred for 1 min at room temperature. After the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for a minute, m-CPBA (9 mg, 0.05 mmol) in 0.1 mL acetone was slowly added into the solution in a few seconds. The vial was capped and the homogenous solution was stirred at room temperature in air for 10 minutes. After 10 min, an aliquot of the reaction mixture was taken and spotted on a silica gel TLC plate. The plate was developed in an appropriate eluent and scanned with a Bioscan AR-2000 Radio TLC Imaging Scanner.

Radio-HPLC Characterization of the ¹⁸F Labeled Products

All labeled molecules were characterized by comparing the radio-HPLC trace of the crude reaction mixture to the HPLC UV trace of the authentic reference sample with methods detailed below. Note: There is a time difference (Δt) between the radio-HPLC trace and the HPLC UV trace due to the delay volume between the diode array detector and the radioactivity detector (for 1.0 ml/min flow rate, Δt≈0.35 min).

Method A

HPLC column: Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18, 5 μm, 4.6×250 mm

Conditions: 3% CH₃CN/H₂O→95% CH₃CN/H₂O over 20 min, 1.0 mL/min

Method B

HPLC column: Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18, 5 μm, 4.6×250 mm

Conditions: 3% CH₃CN/H₂O→95% CH₃CN/H₂O over 25 min, 1.0 mL/min

Method C

HPLC column: Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18, 5 μm, 4.6×150 mm

Conditions: H₂O (0.1% TFA, A) and CH₃CN (0.1% TFA, B), 3%→5% B, 0-3 min; 5%→50% B, 3-6 min; 50%→95%, 6-9 min; 95% B, 9-19 min, 1.0 mL/min

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes to 4% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) 1.34 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 12H), 2.40-2.05 (m, 2H), 2.65 (s, 314), 6.44 (ddd, J=54.0, 6.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J=1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J=1.7 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 28.6, 29.0, 31.4, 31.5, 35.2, 42.7, 48.4, 94.0, 123.6, 125.8, 134.8, 135.1, 154.2, 155.8, 199.9; ¹⁹F NMR −158.6 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₇H₂₃FO [M]⁺: 262.2, found 262.2.

Purification by column chromatography (10% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.70-2.00 (m, 2H), 3.92 (td, J=7.2, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 5.57(ddd, J=47.9, 8.6, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 7.46-7.30 (m, 5H), 7.80-7.67 (m, 2H), 7.85 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 34.6, 35.7, 92.6, 123.2, 125.6, 128.5, 128.7, 132.0, 134.1, 139.3, 168.3; ¹⁹F NMR −175.7 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₇H₁₄FNO₂ [M]⁺: 283.1, found 283.1.

Purification by flash chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.65-6.98 (m, 10H), 5.64 (ddd, J=47.1, 8.1, 5.0 Hz, 2H), 3.58-2.74 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 139.8, 136.8, 129.6, 126.8, 128.5, 125.8, 95.0 (d, J=174.3 Hz), 44.1 (d, J=24.3 Hz); ¹⁹F NMR −173.18 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₃F [M]⁺: 200.1, found 200.1.

Purification by flash chromatography (hexanes)¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.43-7.36 (m, 2H), 7.36-7.31 (m, 2H), 5.48 (ddd, J=48.1, 8.0, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.59-3.31 (m, 2H), 2.19-1.87 (m, 4H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 139.8, 128.5, 125.4, 93.8 (d, J=171.5 Hz), 35.7, 33.4, 28.3; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-176.03 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₀H₁₂BrF [M]⁺: 230.0, found 230.0.

Purification by column chromatography (4% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.85-3.35 (m, 2H), 5.86 (ddd, J=47.7, 9.7, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70-7.20 (m, 6H), 8.20-7.95 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 41.0, 90.5, 126.4, 127.5, 128.9, 130.2, 130.5, 130.6, 132.7, 132.8, 134.2, 136.2, 138.6, 139.2, 194.3; ¹⁹F NMR −168.8 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₅H₁₁FO [M]⁺: 226.1, found 226.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.60 (dd, J=24.0, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 5.59 (dq, J=47.8, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.42-7.20 (m, 4H), 7.58-7.45 (m, 5H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 22.9, 90.8, 125.8, 127.1, 127.3, 127.5, 128.9, 140.7, 140.5, 141.3; ¹⁹F NMR −166.6 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₃F [M]⁺: 200.1, found 200.1.

Purification by column chromatography (1%-20% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.53 (m, 3H), 3.00-2.85 (m, 1H), 3.95 (s, 3H), 4.00 (s, 3H), 5.70 (dt, J=51.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 30.0, 33.7, 56.2, 56.3, 88.2, 108.4, 109.5, 125.3, 135.0, 150.0, 154.0, 195.8; ¹⁹F NMR −169.6 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₂H₁₄FO₃ [M+H]⁺: 225.1, found 225.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.86 (dd, J=23.8, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 6.39 (dq, J=46.8, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.46-7.61 (m, 3H), 7.61-7.68 (m, 1H), 7.82-7.97 (m, 2H), 8.00-8.09 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 22.43 (d, J=25.1 Hz), 88.87 (d, J=167.6 Hz), 122.50 (d, J=10.0 Hz), 123.13 (d, J=1.3 Hz), 125.33, 125.71, 126.32, 128.77 (d, J=1.9 Hz), 128.90, 129.96 (d, J=3.5 Hz), 133.70, 136.98 (d, J=18.0 Hz); ¹⁹F NMR −169.8 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₂H₁₁F [M]⁺: 174.1, found 174.1.

Purification by column chromatography (10% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.66 (dd, J=23.9, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 5.64 (dq, J=47.7, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21-7.04 (m, 2H), 7.46-7.33 (m, 21-1); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 21.5, 23.0, 90.4, 121.8, 126.5, 139.0, 150.5, 169.8; ¹⁹F NMR −166.4 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₀H₁₁FO₂ [M]⁺: 182.1, found 182.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.74 (dd, J=23.8, 6.5 Hz, 3H), 5.80 (dq, J=52.0, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.53-7.42 (m, 3H), 8.01-7.73 (m, 4H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 23.1, 91.3, 123.3, 124.2, 126.2, 127.7, 128.2, 128.4, 128.8, 133.0, 133.1, 138.9; ¹⁹F NMR −166.7 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₂H₁₁F [M]⁺: 174.1, found 174.1.

Purification by column chromatography (5% EtOAc/hexanes). Isolated as a single diastereomer. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.23 (s, 9H), 2.38 (m, 1H), 2.84 (m, 1H), 6.15 (ddd, J=57.4, 6.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (m, 1H), 7.51-7.37 (m, 3H), 7.55 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 27.1, 38.7, 40.6, 75.7, 94.4, 125.3, 125.7, 129.4, 130.5, 140.2, 142.4, 178.6; ¹⁹F NMR −164.1 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₇FO₂ [M]⁺: 236.1, found 236.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.66 (dd, J=24.0, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 5.62 (dq, J=47.5, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.16-7.42 (m, 2H), 7.44-7.65 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 22.98, 90.04, 122.63, 123.79, 128.31, 130.19, 131.22, 143.84; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) −168.86 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈BrF [M]⁺: 202.0, found 202.0.

Purification by column chromatography (hexane to 10% EtOAc/hexanes). Two diastereomers 14a and 14b were separated as shown below.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.33 (m, 4H), 5.68 (dt, J=51.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 6.33 (t, J=4.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (m, 7H), 8.04 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 166.01, 134.80, 134.28, 133.06, 130.34, 129.99, 129.93, 129.69, 129.66, 129.05, 128.37, 87.66, 69.35, 25.42, 24.20; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-160.42 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₇H₁₅FO₂ [M]⁺: 270.1, found 270.1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.31 (m, 4H), 5.62 (ddd, J=51.7, 6.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J=7.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (m, 7H), 8.12 (dd, J=8.2, 1.4 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 166.32, 135.62, 134.88, 133.17, 130.18, 129.80, 129.36, 129.09, 128.58, 128.44, 128.10, 88.56, 70.27, 26.70, 26.53, 24.94; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-161.24 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₇H₁₅FO₂ [M]⁺: 270.1, found 270.1.

Purification by chromatography (hexanes to 20% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 7.48-7.30 (m, 5H), 5.58 (ddd, J=47.6, 8.5, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 2.63-2.05 (m, 4H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 138.3, 129.1, 128.9, 125.4, 119.1, 92.1, 33.0, 13.5; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) −179.5 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₀H₁₀FN [M]⁺: 163.1, found 163.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.66 (dd, J=23.8, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 5.63 (dq, J=47.5, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.13-7.04 (m, 2H), 7.36 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 22.9, 90.4, 115.4, 127.1, 162.6; ¹⁹F NMR −117.2, −166.0 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈F₂ [M]⁺: 142.1, found 142.1.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.67 (dd, J=24.1, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 5.96 (dq, J=46.6, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (td, J=7.8, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (td, J=7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (dq, J=8.1, 1.5 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 141.9, 133.6, 131.0, 129.1, 127.4, 121.2, 90.4, 22.3; ¹⁹F NMR −173.71 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈BrF [M]⁺: 202.0, found 202.0.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.63 (dd, J=24.0, 6.4 Hz, 3H), 5.59 (dq, J=47.4, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.10-7.19 (m, 2H), 7.70-7.81 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 23.1, 90.5, 93.8, 127.3, 137.7, 141.3; ¹⁹F NMR −168.7 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈FI [M]⁺: 250.0, found 250.0.

Purification by column chromatography (5% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.48-1.80 (m, 4H), 2.15-2.31 (m, 2H), 2.67 (qd, J=13.4, 4.3 Hz, 21-1), 4.10-4.27 (m, 1H), 4.88 (d, J=48.1 Hz, 114), 7.79 (ddd, J=37.6, 5.5, 3.1 Hz, 414); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 168.26, 133.87, 131.98, 123.13, 86.86, 49.65, 30.44, 23.89. ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-185.90 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈FI [M]⁺: 247.1, found 247.1.

The regiochemical assignment was made on the basis of three-bond F—C2 coupling, 26.48 ppm (d, J=8.1 Hz). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.80-2.25 (m, 10H), 4.84 (m, 1H), 7.47 (2H), 7.54-7.63 (m, 1H), 8.02-8.11 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 17.66 (d, J=7.9 Hz), 26.48 (d, J=8.1 Hz), 28.55 (d, J=22.5 Hz), 34.04, 34.78 (d, J=22.0 Hz), 74.20, 92.87 (d, J=167.1 Hz), 128.34, 129.55, 130.69, 132.87, 165.86; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-166.58 (m); MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₈H₈FI [M]⁺: 236.1, found 236.1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 0.91 (t, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.22-1.54 (m, 10H), 1.97 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 6H), 2.12-2.25 (m, 4H), 2.57-2.72 (m, 2H), 4.35 (s, 4H), 5.46 (ddd, J=50, 8.1, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.70 (s, 1H), 7.22-7.30 (m, 4H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 13.85, 20.62, 22.63, 23.89 25.15 (d, J=4.5 Hz), 29.15, 29.26, 29.30, 31.76, 33.62, 37.01 (d, J=23.6 Hz), 57.96, 64.36, 94.67 (d, J=168.8 Hz), 125.84 (d, J=6.4 Hz), 128.35, 138.37 (d, J=19.8 Hz), 141.83, 169.89, 170.62; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-167.49 (ddd, J=48.0, 27.6, 16.2 Hz) ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₂₅H₃₈FNO₅ [M]⁺: 451.3, found 451.3.

Purification by column chromatography (hexanes to 5% EtOAc/hexanes). Two diastereomers 22a and 22b were separated as shown below.

(containing two geometrical isomers in 2.8:1 ratio due to the amide moiety). Major isomer: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 7.68-7.58 (m, 1H), 7.59-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.44-7.30 (m, 1H), 5.98 (ddd, J=57.5, 7.3, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (td, J=7.8, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (t, J=1.1 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (dd, J=17.2, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J=17.2, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.18-2.99 (m, 1H), 2.66-2.47 (m, 1H), 2.23 (t, J=2.5 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 156.4, 140.6, 138.7, 130.8, 130.0, 126.0, 125.1, 116.6 (d, J=287.5), 92.9 (d, J=176.4 Hz), 78.6, 71.6, 59.5, 37.5, 32.9; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) δ −68.00 (s), −156.46 (dddd, J=57.7, 26.6, 16.2, 7.0 Hz); HRMS (ESI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₁F₄NNaO [M+Na]⁺: 308.0674, found 308.0670.

Minor isomer: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 7.63-7.59 (m, 1H), 7.52-7.48 (m, 2H), 7.38-7.34 (m, 1H), 6.07-6.01 (m, 1H), 5.97-5.94 (m, 1H), 4.22-4.13 (m, 1H), 3.99-3.92 (m, 1H), 3.05-2.97 (m, 1H), 2.71-2.60 (m, 1H), 2.32 (t, J=2.5 Hz, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 156.4, 141.1, 139.6, 130.5, 129.5, 125.8, 125.3, 115.6 (q, J=287.5), 93.5 (d, J=176.4 Hz), 78.7, 72.8, 58.1, 36.5, 33.5; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) δ −69.16 (s), −155.56.

(containing two geometrical isomers in 2.3:1 ratio due to the amide moiety). Major isomer: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 2.31 (t, J=2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (m, 2H), 3.45 (dd, J=17.4, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J=17.4, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (td, J=7.1, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 6.17 (m, 1H), 7.35 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (m, 2H), 7.64 (dd, J=7.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 32.65, 38.17, 61.33, 71.84, 78.34, 93.76 (d, J=171.6 Hz), 116.50 (d, J=287.5 Hz), 124.54, 126.54, 129.81, 131.14, 140.04, 140.45, 156.81; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) δ −68.32, −160.81; HRMS (ESI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₂F₄NO [M+H]⁺: 286.0855, found 286.0858.

Minor isomer: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 2.45 (t, J=2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (m, 2H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J=18.8, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (td, J=7.6, 7.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (ddd, J=55.1, 6.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (m, 2H), 7.61 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, Methylene Chloride-d₂) δ 35.51, 37.27, 61.65, 73.24, 78.03, 94.77 (d, J=171.4 Hz), 114.00 (d, J=233.8 Hz), 124.27, 126.13, 129.22, 130.57, 140.17, 140.88, 157.10; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) −69.33, −162.23.

Purification by column chromatography (10% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) 0.77 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.42 (dd, J=7.3, 4.5 Hz, 3H), 2.01 (dh, J=16.8, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 3.66 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (dd, J=47.0, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.25-7.10 (m, 4H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 17.6, 18.4, 18.6, 34.2, 34.4, 45.1, 52.1, 99.2, 126.46, 126.52, 127.5, 138.5, 140.7, 175.1; ¹⁹F NMR −179.2 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₄H₁₉FO₂ [M]⁺: 238.1, found 238.1.

¹H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d₆) δ 7.38-7.27 (m, 3H), 6.38 (br, 1H), 5.60 (ddd, J=47.6 7.6, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.58-3.44 (m, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s, 9H); ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, acetone-d₆) δ 167.79, 167.78, 155.84, 142.65, 142.59, 136.60, 123.81, 123.70, 121.11, 91.96, 78.30, 45.94, 27.72, 19.67, 19.66; ¹⁹F NMR −182.20 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₁₇H₂₃FNO₆ [M]⁺: 355.1, found 355.1.

Purification by column chromatography (5% EtOAc/hexanes). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.03 (s, 6H), 1.22 (m, 2H), 1.65 (m, 4H), 2.14 (m, 4H), 2.60 (d, J=6.2 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (m, 4H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 169.43, 133.90, 131.72, 122.73, 93.69, 62.44, 49.07, 47.56, 44.89, 43.83, 34.82, 29.22; ¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-135.68 ppm; MS (EI) m/z cal'd C₂₀H₂₂FNO₂ [M]⁺: 327.2, found 327.2.

Example 2 Formation and Characterization of [Mn(IV)(O)(Mcp)(L)]⁺ Complex

[Mn(IV)(O)(mcp)(L)]⁺ was prepared by treating Mn(II)(mcp)(CF₃SO₃)₂ with m-CPBA in CH₃CN at −30° C. Mn(II)(mcp)(CF₃SO₃)₂ (2 mg, 1 mM) dissolved in 3 mL of CH₃CN was stirring at −30° C. for 5 minutes. m-CPBA (2.6 mg, 5 equiv.) in 200 μL CH₃CN was added in one portion. Reaction was run under −30 C and UV-vis spectrum was used to monitor progress of reaction, showing the appearance of a new absorption at 751 nm as illustrated in FIG. 8. After the reaction was finished, the mixture was frozen by liquid N for measurement of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). All EPR were run at 5K using CH₃CN as solvent. When Mn(mcp)(CF₃SO₃)₂ was oxidized to [Mn(IV)(O)(mcp)(L)]⁺, the EPR exhibits a characteristic rhombic Mn(IV) signal. In addition to characteristic Mn(IV) peak, a small amount of multiline was observed at g=2 region, which can be assigned as a small amount of Mn(II) species as illustrated in FIG. 9.

Example 3 Preparation of [Mn(II)(Mep)F₂](PF₆)

[Mn(II)(mep)F₂](PF₆) was prepared by treating mep ligand (N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis-(2-pyridyl methyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine) with stoichiometric amount of MnF₃. Typically, after mep (270 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL 1:1 THF/MeOH, MnF (112 mg, 1 mmol) MnF₃ was added into the solution in solid form and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate, NBu₄PF₆ (1.55 g, 4 mmol) saturated in THF was added into reaction mixture. The resulting solution was left without stirring until the crystallization was finished. The product was collected by filtration (416 mg, 82% yield).

Example 4 Reaction of t-Butyl 2-Phenylpropaneperoxoate with [Mn(II)(Mep)F₇](PF₆)

The thermal decomposition of t-butyl 2-phenylpropaneperoxoate was conducted at 105 C in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of [Mn(II)(mep)F₂](PF₆). Typically, a 4 mL vial with a screw cap was charged with [Mn(II)(mep)F₂](PF₆) (50.8 mg, 0.1 mmol) and t-butyl 2-phenylpropaneperoxoate (22.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) and a stir bar. The vial was evacuated and backfilled with N₂ for three times. Degassed CH CN (1 mL) was added into the vial via syringes, and the vial was sealed by parafilm. After the solution was heated at 105 C for 10 minutes, the vial was cooled to room temperature and the yield of 1-fluoroethyl benzene was determined by ¹⁹F NMR (6-166.6 ppm) using 4-nitrofluorobenzene as the internal standard.

Various embodiments of the invention have been described in fulfillment of the various objects of the invention. It should be recognized that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and adaptations thereof will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. 

1. A method of fluorination comprising: providing a reaction mixture including a non-heme manganese catalyst, a substrate comprising an sp³ C—H bond and a fluorinating agent; and converting the sp³ C—H bond to a sp³ C—F bond via transfer of fluorine to the substrate from an equatorial ligand position on the non-heme manganese catalyst.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein fluorine is transferred to the substrate from a cis-F—Mn—OH species of the non-heme manganese catalyst.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the fluorinating agent comprises an ¹⁸F source to provide a sp³ C-¹⁸F bond
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the ¹⁸F source is [¹⁸F]F⁻.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the [¹⁸F]F⁻ is no carrier added.
 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the sp³ C—H bond is part of an alkyl moiety or cycloalkyl moiety.
 7. The method of claim 6 having a radiochemical conversion greater than 50 percent.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate includes one or more aryl or heteroaryl moieties.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate includes one or more functionalities selected from the group consisting of ester, ether, ketone, cyanide, imide, aryl halide and alkyl halide.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-heme manganese catalyst is of formula (I)

wherein L₁ and L₂ form a first bidentate ligand and L₃ and L₄ form a second bidentate ligand optionally bound to the first bidentate ligand to form a tetradentate ligand and wherein X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of fluorine, hydroxyl (OH), oxo (O) and species displaceable by fluorine.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein species displaceable by fluorine are selected from the group consisting of triflate (OTf), mesylate (OMs) and tosylate (OTs).
 12. The method of claim 10, wherein L₁-L₁ form a tetradentate ligand and X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of triflate (OTf), mesylate (OMs) and tosylate (OTs).
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction mixture further comprises an oxidant.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the oxidant is soluble in solvent of the reaction mixture.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-heme manganese catalyst is present in the reaction mixture in an amount of 1-30 mol %.
 16. The method of claim 3 having a radiochemical conversion of at least 30 percent.
 17. The method of claim 3 having a radiochemical conversion of at least 50 percent.
 18. The method of claim 1, wherein solvent of the reaction mixture is acetone or acetonitrile.
 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate is a bioactive compound.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the bioactive compound is selected from the group consisting of celestolide, protected fingolimod, N-TFA-rasagiline, ibuprofen ester, protected dopamine, N-Phth-amantadine and derivatives thereof.
 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction mixture is free of phase transfer catalyst.
 22. A manganese complex of formula (I):

wherein L₁ and L₂ form a first bidentate ligand and L₃ and L₄ form a second bidentate ligand optionally bound to the first bidentate ligand to form a tetradentate ligand and wherein X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of fluorine, hydroxyl (OH), oxo (O) and species displaceable by fluorine.
 23. The manganese complex of claim 22, wherein L₁-L₄ form a tetradentate ligand and X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of triflate (OTf), mesylate (OMs) and tosylate (OTs).
 24. The manganese complex of claim 22, wherein L₁-L₄ form a tetradentate ligand and X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from the group consisting of fluorine, hydroxyl (OH) and oxo (O).
 25. The manganese complex of claim 24, wherein X₁ and X₂ are each fluorine.
 26. The manganese complex of claim 24, wherein X₁ is fluorine and X₂ is hydroxyl (OH).
 27. The manganese complex of claim 23, wherein the tetradentate ligand is selected from the group consisting of N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)cyclohexane-trans-1,2-diamine (mcp), (N,N′-dimethyl-N,N′-bis-(2-pyridyl methyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine) (mep) and 2-((2-[1-(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)pyridine) (pdp) and derivatives thereof. 